mcdull

我另一部用3600 B450 Mortar Max
点set都会弹need increase LLC
唔set 1300mV会蓝画面

via HKEPC Reader ...
nirokzhk 发表于 2020-9-30 19:08

screen cap... may be 供电真系太差.

mcdull

呢个App唔知点解当hang机后唔会save低hang机前的最高frequency同电压，变相要自已睇住超，唔系甘方便 ...
l0001 发表于 2020-9-30 23:27

因为佢正常唔应该hang机. hang左最高 frequency亦唔再有参考价值.

mcdull

起码都要save低未hang机最高个freq，次次重启都要再入过，有时睇漏眼又要由头再来过 ...
l0001 发表于 2020-10-1 01:30

    佢都系预你 run 15 分钟啫.

manhoi

beta2没再叫我reduce LLC
得出个结果就系咁 但系太弱鸡 我可唔可以俾多D电佢 等佢帮我再试高D

下载 (142.19 KB)

2020-10-1 10:42

jackytkh

回覆 21# mcdull


    我试过1300mv开波，行到STEP 4，佢上到150X mv ，之后REBOOT

JIMillim

留意底板对 ClockTuner for Ryzen(CTR) 有明显影响
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/clocktuner_for_ryzen_ctr_guide_download,4.html
ASUS boards have a bonus in this regard, which allows the user to customize VRM individually for their tasks. During internal testing, in addition to ASUS motherboards, the CTR project demonstrated excellent MSI compatibility. Gigabyte was slightly behind because in Auto mode Vdroop was far from the recommended range, which is 1-2.3%. Despite the excellent VRM components, ASRock boards in most cases failed to meet the challenge set by CTR. Vdroop "floated" within the range of 6 - 3%. Of course, this can be fixed in microcode, but it's up to ASRock to meet the users. Unfortunately, I did not have a BIOSTAR board.

华硕主板在这方面有一个加分项，用户可以根据自己的任务单独定制VRM。在内测过程中，除了华硕主板外，CTR项目还表现出了优秀的微星兼容性。技嘉稍显落后，因为在自动模式下，Vdroop与推荐范围相差甚远，也就是1-2.3%。尽管华擎主板采用了优秀的VRM组件，但在大多数情况下，华擎主板都未能达到CTR设定的挑战。Vdroop "浮动 "在6-3%的范围内。当然，这可以在微码中解决，但能否满足用户的要求，就要看华擎了。遗憾的是，我没有BIOSTAR板子。
通过 www.DeepL.com/Translator（免费版）翻译

nirokzhk

块msi b450 mortar max行beta2都系不停弹need increase Vdrop仲系2.x%

via HKEPC Reader for Android